Sunday, September 30

Grrrrr.......

Maybe its just me. Maybe I'm just in a really bad mood today.

I was browsing an O magazine and found a short article titled Why Am I Here? I read it and now I am so irritated that I wish I hadn't.
Your primary purpose on earth is to recognize your true nature as a spiritual, creative being. ..... When you recognize that you are a divine immortal being with the power to create and master many abilities, then trouble and despair subside and your human experience becomes joyful, calm and peaceful.

I'm sorry but even from inside my current disillusioned, agnostic, sceptical point of view, this reeks of New Age bullsh*t. The kind of thinking that seduces people into believing that simply by embracing their inner god of goddess, they will evolve into some kind of enlightened superspiritual being and all their problems will vanish. Its even more unrealistic than the magical thinking that pervades some branches of Christianity!

I googled the book the quote came from and found this from a review on Amazon:
" The book is channeled by the author's spirit teacher guides, The Three Bishops, as well as Joachim and the Emissaries of the Third Ray. These highly evolved and loving guides work specifically to bring about understanding, direction, and support to all souls so that we may learn to become the creative masters of the life that we’re intended to have on Earth. The guides state that Earth is “soul school,” and that we’re here to master 22 basic soul lessons in order to fulfill our purpose. Each lesson is laid out in such a way that anyone—on any level—will be ready to follow the instructions. The guides make it very clear in this book that the timing to learn our soul lessons, open our hearts, and raise our vibration on the Earth plane is now. Negative occurrences will worsen if our energy doesn’t shift and elevate to a more loving plane. We have no time to waste!"

How anyone can swallow such hogwash is beyond me! 22 soul lessons? Emissaries of the Third Ray? Raise our vibrations? Puh-leese! Tell that to the innocents who died in Bosnia, Rwanda and the Congo; to the child soldiers in the Sudan; to those battling cancer and AIDS ... just raise your vibrations and embrace soul lesson number 12, guys, and all will be well.

Rant over.

The God Conundrum and Multi-level Marketing

Here is just one of the many things that has baffled me over the last while.

According to the evangelical, biblical point of view, God created man 'for his pleasure'. To quote the bible, Revelation 4:11 says, “Thou hast created all things, and for Thy pleasure they are and were created.” According to everything I was taught, God's desire is for us to freely choose to love him, not just serve him robotically, so when he created man, he also gave him 'free will' so that man might willingly choose to love God, to set aside all self-interest and serve him and him only.

But having this gift of free will from God also means that man can potentially say to God: 'Well, thanks for creating me (in your image with all these amazing attributes such as the ability to love and care and think and reason and create and all), but actually I think I'm going to choose to be captain of my own fate, master of my own soul."

So, the question is this: why then would God turn around and say: "Sorry, you made the WRONG CHOICE! You were supposed to choose to love me! Now I'm going to punish you by casting you into the eternal (eternal, mind you!) burning fires of hell?" (If you believe that hell literally exists of course!) If that's the case, then what the heck is the point of having free will in the first place? We should all have been created with an in-built, incorruptible love for God then there would have been no need for messy lakes of fire and judgement calls and God could have taken all the pleasure he wanted from us all along without having to send the billions who never 'accepted Jesus into their hearts' to eternal damnation, which must be really hard for him to do seeing as he says he loves us all equally.

And another thing: what is the purpose of punishment, anyway? To correct someone who has gone wrong, surely? Or to wipe them out once and for all, no second chances, no opportunity to make things right, to be redeemed?

And about the idea of us being created solely for God's pleasure. Isn't that kind of one-sided too? Sometimes the evangelical viewpoint makes me feel so manipulated:

You are born. You grow up and after a while you learn that you are a sinner - albeit a sinner with free will. You go along, living your life doing good stuff and bad stuff. You learn that God loves you even though you are such an ugly dirty sinner and he wants you to love him. But at some point you learn that the good stuff isn't good enough for God, you'll be going to hell when you die unless you make some major changes. And to help you along the way, the spirit of God sneaks into your most private thoughts and makes you feel really bad about doing the bad stuff. So you say sorry to God and choose to put your self to death and to live only for him. Now he's happy because you are loving him and being obedient to him and all the other Christians out there rejoice because - you've arrived! "Welcome to the club! "

Now your new mission in life is to get all the unsaved billions out there to join the club too - for their own good of course..... doesn't this sound an awful lot like multilevel marketing?

Too many questions, too many doubts, too few answers.... but the good news today is that my new book arrived! The God Theory by Bernhard Haisch. It looks like a long, slow read ... but it looks good.

Sunday, September 23

Braggin' on my babies

Sometimes your kids do or say things that just make you want to tell the world what great kids they really are. This week, after all the trauma of the failed drivers license, M made us real proud of him.

He placed 6th out of his class of 32 (and 41st in his grade of 208 kids) in the mock matric exams. And if that wasn't great enough, on Thursday night at the school cultural awards dinner, he was awarded full colors for service to Backstage--he's been part of the backstage support crew for the last three years of high school.

Go, M!!!

Then my daughter. She and a friend were talking about 'big words' tonight and she says - "I know TWO big words!" (Big laugh from the friend). "Yep" she says. "Protagonist and antagonist." "Huh?" says the friend. "Protagonist" says my girl,"is the character in a story who goes through the most change during the story, and antagonist is the person or thing who causes the most change!"

Oh, she rocks!!! :-) We talked about this a while back and she remembered!!

*Insert proud smiling face picture here!*

Wednesday, September 19

I love this picture


It's apparently called 'The Day God Spilled The Paint'.

Next Year

Today something weird happened. I was talking to M on the way to the test center about me and my thoughts and dreams and hopes and plans for next year, to try and take his mind off the upcoming test. I don't know if he was too interested but it kept us occupied for the half hour drive.

I said: "Next year just has to be better than this year has been." And I waffled on about some of the ideas I'd had and which ones looked potentially feasible and which ones were turning out to be just a laugh a minute. Then I added,"Of course next year has one big disadvantage in the 'must be better' stakes."

"What's that?" he said.

"Well," and by now I'm feeling stupid, "well, next year is the year I turn--I turn-f--f--fi--fi..." and I simply could not bring myself to utter the word? It was as if I was blocked, muted, gagged. But he got it.

"What is so bad about being fifty?" he asked. So I tried to explain. "It means you're not a beautiful, supple twenty-something anymore. Or even a vibrant, full-of-potential, richly fertile thirty-year-old. You can't even claim to be a fabulous forty, in the prime of life!"

He's like - "Well, duh mom! Of course you're not." So I tried again.

"It's more to do with loss of hope. The brutal reality is that my chance to be a young, beautiful and desirable woman is now officially past. And that makes me feel sad."

Looking back, it often feels as if I somehow missed out on being that person in the past and that turning *this age* kind of puts the seal on the fact that I'll never ever be that person. :-( Instead, I get to be officially 'middle-aged'. Before this, I could still refer to myself as 'forty-something' and get away with it, but the Big Five Oh puts a stop to all that. End. Finito. Over and done with.

Over the hill. :-(

Actually, although I still hate, loathe and detest the idea, it doesn't cause quite the same emotionally devastating surge of rage and depression it has done for the last few years. I *know* that it's important for my psychological development that I accept and embrace this next step. And hopefully, next year with all its changes will be a part of that process. I'm actually really excited about a possible 'Me Year' and what better year for that than a landmark birthday year?

And in other not-so-wonderful news, M did not get his license. He had a fair shot at it, he passed all the yard tests like parking and three-point-turns etc, and his examiner said his actual driving was absolutely fine, but he failed him because at a traffic circle, he and another car arrived almost simultaneously and although M judged it safe to go, technically he should have waited. It's a bummer. He seems to have bounced back quicker today though, I think I'm the one who is most exhausted now, having encouraged and cajoled and supported him through the last twenty-four hours of fear and dithering. Not to mention sitting in long queues for paperwork and paying all the fees for the second time.

C'est la effing vie.

Tuesday, September 18

Walking through D-Day ....

What a nightmare.

Less than ten minutes after Examiner Guy took M off, they came back, and one look at my boy's face told me that D stood for Disaster, not Driver's License.

He was devastated. The guy failed him on item one - ie reverse parking- simply because when he stopped, he didn't stop deep enough into the bay.

While M tried to pull himself together, I went to rebook him, and was told that the next available date would be in Feb 2008, and that we'd have to join the very long queue downstairs to do the paperwork, retake the eye test and pay the fee again. We decided to do it later, and left.

On the way out, we met up with M's instructor who was bringing another pupil in for her test. We told him what had happened and he said: 'Did the guy tell you where he wanted you to stop?"

"No," said M.

"He should have," said the instructor. We talked some more and as a result, back upstairs we went to talk to the Chief Examiner. And to cut a long story short, the Chief Examiner called in Examiner Guy, quizzed him, and then told us that we were in the right and the Examiner was in the wrong. He should have said to M: "Reverse in here, as far as this pole, and then stop." He didn't do that and therefore he had no right to fail M.

But as far as M was concerned, the vindication was too late. He was still emotionally shattered, felt like a completely useless failure as a driver and we'd wasted a day and the fees not getting his license. And all that the Chief Examiner could offer us was the name and fax number of somebody higher up to whom I could address a letter explaining the situation and asking for a free second test, which might be sooner if there was a cancellation or still might be in Feb next year.

By this stage, I was seething with rage and frustration, but there was nothing we could do about it. All we could do was go home, M still feeling devastated and me full of righteous anger and frustration.

Less than half an hour after we got home, the phone rang. It was Mr Chief Examiner and he said: "I can jump your son to the head of the queue - if he'd like to come in tomorrow, he can retake the test at 2pm. But you'll still have to redo the paperwork and pay the fees. What would you like to do?"

So, tomorrow we go back again, to retake the test. I'm working very hard here to help M overcome the demon of Fear that makes him want to never, ever go back there again, not tomorrow and not next February. Character-building it may be, but comfortable it is not!

Your good thoughts and prayers are appreciated!

D- Day

I wasn't going to blog about this until after the event but ... my son takes his driver's license test at 10am this morning. I don't know who is more nervous, him or me.

The examiners at this test center are freakily perfectionistic, impossibly picky, totally demanding and will fail you - on the spot - if you roll back even 1 cm during your three-point turn. (It happened to the student who was there when we went for the practice drive last Wednesday morning - she didn't even get out on the road!)

So my boy, who is basically a good driver, is a bit anxious, to say the least. As is his mother.

More later.

Saturday, September 15

Silver linings.

After having toyed with the idea for six or seven years, in May 2005 I attended an introductory meeting for nurses interested in emigrating to the US and finally made the decision to give it a go! Got started on the process which was estimated to take between two and two and a half years.

Paperwork, paperwork, paperwork! It seemed to never end. Got a job offer from a hospital in central CA. Medicals, bloodwork, telephone interviews. Lost that job offer when the hospital group changed ownership. But we kept going. Studied for, wrote and passed the NCLEX exam in June 2006. In October 2006, we heard that emigration processing had speeded up and there was a chance that we'd get there sooner, much much sooner. Like within six months - yippee!! More paperwork. Took the IELTS exam for English proficiency. Got a police clearance. More paperwork. Finally, in January 2007, the emigration attorneys filed my I-140 application, the second to last step in the process. When the I-140 is approved, you get a INS priority date, meaning you are in the home stretch - just a consular interview to get through and finally, that Green Card will be yours.

Time passed and we waited. The news was that processing time seemed to have slowed right down again, people were waiting longer now, much much longer. Like EIGHTEEN MONTHS from the issuing of an I-140 to getting a priority date, a wait that used to take max 4- 5 months.

A few days ago, I got an email from my agent, who is wonderful and amazingly committed and supportive.

It is so difficult to judge timing etc for applications right now. We need to find an offer for you as soon as possible and I have someone who might be interested in the Home Health side at the moment and am waiting for their response to your resume’.

My opinion is that you should do what you need to do in order to survive in South Africa for at least another year to 18 months judging from the current INS priority dates.

Well. That was a blow and no mistake. Part of my need for this to happen relates to the fact that in many ways we are living 'in limbo' - not really wanting to get too deeply into anything here but not able to get involved in anything over there either. My son who is graduating from high school in Dec this year has registered for a one year Foundation course in 2008, with a view to continuing his education when we get to the States. My daughter goes into Grade 10 next year - we'd hoped she'd be able to start senior high in the US not here, as the curricula are very different. I've been marking time with several part-time jobs, gradually distancing myself from friends, not dating and wrestling with existential crises, lol!

More importantly, though, with the upcoming move in mind, I recently accepted an offer on my house, made by dear friends who plan to sell their own large home and renovate my smaller home into a comfortable retirement property. The deal isn't done yet--they have to sell before it can go through. But with my son moving out in Jan (he'll probably live with his dad for 2008, which will be great for them and will mean easier access to college for him), I'd planned to rent something really small and easy to maintain for my daughter and myself. Put the money from the house sale into the bank and let the interest fund the rental property. That still seems like a good plan.

But here's the biggie: In many ways, I've felt like I've really wasted time the last year or so. Not doing much writing. Not developing career-wise, just getting by with not very challenging part-time work. Not doing anything constructive at all, really. Just drifting along, gathering dust, getting depressed (and indulging in a lot of comfort eating!) Now I suddenly have a large chunk of time up ahead for which I have no specific plans. A year to a year and a half.. maybe even two, who knows?

I could carry on drifting, waiting, dreaming, eating, reading, blogging etc etc.

OR I could take hold of this time and make it productive.

So I started thinking about all the things I've often thought of doing, if I had the time and money. And I made a list, including the serious and the silly (and I'm very open to more suggestions!):

  1. Do an MFA in creative writing
  2. Get a personal trainer and get into shape
  3. Study primary health care, useful for advanced nursing practice in the US
  4. Audit courses in a subject that interests me … science, philosophy, literature, cosmology
  5. Write, produce and direct a short movie
  6. Study naturopathy or homeopathy
  7. Plan, train for and do some kind of challenging trip eg the Otter Trail, or cycling from here to Durban (yeah, and get murdered along the way? No thanks! ;-) Maybe somewhere outside SA would work though ....
  8. Buy a video camera and learn to use it
  9. Buy a good digital camera and do a digital photography course
  10. Join an amateur dramatic society and get involved in a few plays
  11. Do a course in counselling e.g. LifeLine or similar
  12. Do a basic paramedic course and volunteer part time with CMR
  13. Do a course in therapeutic massage or reflexology
  14. Learn to speak French
  15. Learn to play a musical instrument, eg violin, cello
  16. Learn a new software package, eg InDesign
  17. Take up bellydancing or paragliding or rockclimbing or microlighting - something that stretches me mentally and physically

Now I'm doing the research, looking into everything, doing the financial calculations, thinking hard, dreaming big. If it works out, the gray cloud of delay could have a shiny silver lining and this might just be the midlife sabbatical year I've often dreamt of taking.


Tuesday, September 11

Two Books

As part of my ongoing quest for truth, I'm doing a lot of reading. Confession time: I have a bad habit of not always finishing non-fiction books; all too often I dip into something, get a hold of the main idea behind it, and then skim read it to the end.

Bad me. :-(

But onto Book One. I'm currently re-reading a very good book, one I read years and years ago but which I had forgotten about until now. It's The Christian Agnostic by Leslie D Weatherhead. It seems I'm not the only one who remembers this book from way back then and who is re-reading it now. To quote one Amazon reviewer:

I read this book many years ago and recently decided to read it again. I am totally amazed at the willingness of Leslie Weatherhead to open the Christian Faith to open minded thinking. He says it's ok to be an agnostic about the doctrinal stuff, and still find great meaning and life in the core of the faith. He then proceeds to open mindedly deal with many issues in an "outside the box" kind of way. I did not agree with everything he says, but he does not require this. He gives the thinking Christian permission and blessing to think for himself or herself, and insists, that the truth of Christianity is that which we grasp and apprehend for ourselves, the rest can be stored in an imaginary file in the mind. He writes with warmth and humility. He was one of the great preachers and pastors of our time. Everyone, Christian or not, will be enriched by this special book. It was written many years ago, and dated in some respects, but the flavor of Weatherhead is a wonderful flavor indeed. I loved it.
Agreed, on all counts.

Book Two is one I discovered when googling something else altogether! I read the blurbs, the reviews, the home page of the author and something inside me just went YES! So I've ordered it and hopefully it will arrive in two to three weeks time (one of the joys of living in Africa....) but seeing as I have the Christian Agnostic to keep me busy, I'll be patient. So, Book Two is called The God Theory: Universes, Zero-point Fields, And What's Behind It All by Bernard Haisch, published in May 2006. The Amazon editorial review describes it thus:

Physicist Haisch thinks "Let there be light" isn't just a randomly chosen phrase for the Creation. Indeed, he believes that in the mysteries of light rest clues to the deepest mysteries of the universe, something he calls God, though he doesn't mean by that word the personification that some believers prefer. A scientist who has worked in astrophysics and theoretical physics, Haisch has retained his wonder at the universe from childhood, as he describes in the affecting memoir with which the book begins. Many scientists find no tension between their profession and the profession of belief in divinity, but Haisch goes one step further by attempting to find a scientific explanation for the phenomenon generally called God. Light, that familiar but utterly mysterious force, is the key to such an understanding. Readable and engaging, Haisch will be embraced by those concerned with finding ways of reconciling science and religion. Patricia Monaghan
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
This is the coolest sounding book I've come across in a long time. I hope it gets here soon!





Monday, September 10

Dead Dog on the Tube

On the radio today, I heard a DJ interviewing one of the finalists in a "Gigantic Mistakes" competition and a young woman shared her Gigantic Mistake.

She was house-sitting in London some time ago, taking care of the single, childless home-owner's very, very, very precious dog at the same time. As luck would have it, the dog died. Bad news. Not knowing what to do with the body, she called a vet and was told she could bring the body in and they would dispose of it.

Well. As she had no car and no spare money for a cab, she opted to use the tube. Next problem was how to carry a dead dog (a Staffie!) on the tube without either contravening some health regulation or grossing out all the other travellers! So, she stuck the dog in a suitcase.

Lugging the Dog-in-a-Case through the Central London underground proved exhausting as the Staffie was pretty heavy. So she was quite relieved when a young man offered to help her, but he soon wanted to know what was in her bag that was making it so heavy. Not wanting to admit to carrying around a dead dog, she said she was moving house and the case was full of clothes, books, CDs etc .

Big mistake!

The next thing she knew, the young man had disappeared along with her Dog-in-a-Case!

The hardest part was telling the bereaved homeowner what had happened and why it wasn't going to be possible for her to view the remains of her beloved pet...

Bummer! I wonder how the thief felt when he opened up the case and found the Corpse .....

Thursday, September 6

RAD and GOD

I have been researching RAD—Reactive Attachment Disorder—for the purposes of a current writing project. RAD is a psycho-physiological disorder that can occur when the child, in its first 3 years of life, experiences early separation from the primary caregiver, or repeated losses or changes of the primary caregiver, or is abused, neglected or abandoned.

It can show itself in many way, either as an inhibited disorder (kid doesn't relate to anyone, very antisocial, never seeks comfort, or help, or support etc) OR the opposite way (kid is overly familiar and amazingly sweet and charming with strangers, but at home, is exceptionally abusive and in facts hates the person who is now the primary caregiver, no matter how loving that person is.)

Both conditions are as a result of failure to develop TRUST in the first year of life and both come from the fact that basically, the kid's heart as been broken. They can't accept love because they have learnt that when you reach out for love, you don't get it or it hurts or you get it and then it gets taken away again, so they build huge defensive walls around their hearts and protect themselves against all attempts by anyone to really love them.

I won’t go into the therapy and prognosis here; suffice it to say that the road is heart-breakingly long and often ends in failure anyway.

Anyway. The point of this post is that today I was reading an article on RAD and the use of neurofeedback

and came across these two snippets:

“Attachment is the fundamental drive in human beings. It is a drive that brings aggression and sexuality to its defense and to its enhancement, and it is the precursor to human love. It is gained through the delicate interplay of vocal tone and facial expression, through body to body communication, through the dyadic system of care that develops when the mother attunes to her baby.”

It occurred to me that this is also basically what happens when we make friends, build relationships, and fall in love. We want to build a connection to the other person and we use all the tools at our disposal to grow that attachment: along with verbal communication, we use eye contact, body language, mirroring, tonal inflection and so much more. Remember being best friends with someone at school who really ‘got you’? Remember flirting? Remember falling in love?

Then, this:

“I am reminded of a film I saw in graduate school titled "Ben". In it, for purposes of the experiment, an emotionally attuned mother agrees not to respond to the smile of her well bonded six month old son. When he smiled, she made no expression. He looked momentarily bewildered and smiled again. She still did not respond. His face clouded and he began to look agitated but he tried again. This time when his mother failed to smile in return he looked alarmed and anxious and began to cry. His mother, who has been valiantly cooperative with the researchers up to that point, could stand it no longer. She picked him up and comforted him, holding and rocking him, cooing and mirroring his facial expressions. His equilibrium was rapidly restored. This entire interaction, as I recall, unfolded in less than two minutes.

Imagine, then, what it must be like for the child of a depressed or addicted or narcissistically absent mother who cannot provide this attunement and emotional repair. This child, too, will attempt to engage her mother; it is her nature. These attempts to recruit the mother could go on intermittently for weeks, months or even years. I am suggesting that, as was true for Ben, each failure heightens negative affect. The child experiences increasing levels of distress that, without predictable maternal intervention escalate into disorganizing anxiety until, finally, the baby gives up, affectively “burning out” and collapsing into a state of deep despair. Her initial distress becomes fear that mounts into terror and then implodes into nothingness, a state beyond hopelessness, a state of no other and no self, a state too diffuse, too cellular, too absolute and too horrifying to any longer be recognized as fear.”

Is it stretching a point to see this as a picture of what happens to those of us who have spent years trying (and failing) to attach to God? We attempt to engage him and he seems not to respond …each failure heightens the negative affect … leading to increasing levels of distress (existential anxiety) … finally, we burn out and give up, collapsing into a state of deep despair and fear….

Attachment fails. So we get vitriolic and yell at God, screaming out our hate and fear and disappointment, driven by the need to generate a reaction, any reaction at all. When still nothing happens, we retreat into intellectualism. We find a thousand ways to ‘prove’ that God doesn’t exist, that its all self-deception, that religion is just a conditioned societal response and as we evolve further, as we mature, we can let go of that need to be attached to something greater than ourselves… we can manage without God’s love which has proved, over and over again, to be illusory and disappointing.

Finally, we put up walls of disillusionment, skepticism, cynicism and despair. We protect ourselves against hope. We grow cold and hard and we sneer and smirk when people say things like ‘The Lord told me …” and “If it’s God’s will, then …”

It would seem that attachment to God has failed. But these days I'm thinking that just maybe the way forward isn't to stay mired in my failure to find God, nor is it to retreat into atheism or cyncism. Maybe, for now, all I need to do is to keep seeking a new paradigm of who 'God' is. Maybe all these years I've been looking in all the wrong places for the wrong God. Because underneath all my disappointment and pain, I can't seem to shake the sense that somewhere, somehow ... God IS.

Sunday, September 2

All about Heath.



Time to come out of the closet in another area, lol.

Last year, for the first time ever, I fell in love with a movie star. I became a fan. A Heath fan. A Heath Ledger fan, to be precise, although I much prefer the word "admirer" - fan makes me sound about 16 years old... which isn't altogether a bad thing! :-)

For those who don't know, Heath has starred in, amongst other films, The Patriot, Brokeback Mountain, Casanova and Candy and is currently filming the upcoming Batman sequel, The Dark Knight, in which he plays The Joker. I hang out now and then at Heath Ledger Central, which is run by my friend Theresa, who is a close friend of Heath's. I had the pleasure earlier this year of exchanging PM's with Heath, who is an supremely talented actor as well as a decent, sincere, funny and genuinely nice man.

So this weekend in Heath-world, there was good news and bad news. The good news was that my friend Amy was on holiday in NYC for a few days and when she stepped out of the door one day, who should be standing a few feet away but the man himself! (She recognized him by his tattoos first of all, as he was mostly incognito behind red Ray Bans and a rather odd hat!) So she went and introduced herself and got a wonderful picture on her camera phone. She says this about him:

"But he is so very softspoken and polite and nervous -- he giggled a bit as I was trying to maintain my composure while saying stupid things blah blah blah. I still cannot believe it happened -- I actually met Heath!!!"

But the sad news is that Heath and his partner Michelle Williams, whom he met on the set of Brokeback Mountain, are now officially separated. Their baby girl Matilda is only 23 months old. My little daughter was just short of two when I got divorced and in hindsight, if you have to have a break up, it is much better to make the break when the kids are still young. My son, who was five at the time, had a much harder time of it--my daughter seemed to just go with the flow.... but still, I'm sad for him that it had to happen at all. I wish him lots of peace and strength .


Heath and Matilda at Disneyland a few weeks ago.
Pic from Celebrity Baby Blog